Lehmer's Mahler measure problem
Beat Lehmer's 1.17628 with an integer polynomial of smaller Mahler measure above 1, or prove the measures stay away from 1.
State the problem, from Optimization Constants in Mathematics
Browse files+45 −0 README.md added View file
| @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ | ||
| 1 | +# Lehmer's Mahler measure problem | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | +Can an integer polynomial have Mahler measure larger than 1 but arbitrarily close to it? Lehmer asked in 1933, and his own degree-10 example, with measure 1.17628..., is still the smallest known; an integer polynomial below it would be checked in seconds. | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | +## Problem | |
| 6 | + | |
| 7 | +For a polynomial $f(x) = a_n \prod_{i=1}^{n} (x - \alpha_i)$ with complex coefficients, the *Mahler measure* is | |
| 8 | + | |
| 9 | +$$M(f) = |a_n| \prod_{i=1}^{n} \max\{1, |\alpha_i|\}.$$ | |
| 10 | + | |
| 11 | +For $f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ one has $M(f) \ge 1$, and by Kronecker's theorem $M(f) = 1$ exactly when $f$ is, up to sign, a product of cyclotomic polynomials and powers of $x$. Let | |
| 12 | + | |
| 13 | +$$L = \inf \{ M(f) : f \in \mathbb{Z}[x],\ M(f) > 1 \}.$$ | |
| 14 | + | |
| 15 | +**Lehmer's question** asks whether $L = 1$. Lehmer's polynomial | |
| 16 | + | |
| 17 | +$$\ell(x) = x^{10} + x^9 - x^7 - x^6 - x^5 - x^4 - x^3 + x + 1$$ | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | +has $M(\ell) = 1.176280\ldots$, so $1 \le L \le 1.176280\ldots$. Determine $L$: prove $L > 1$, or find integer polynomials with measure closer to 1. | |
| 20 | + | |
| 21 | +## Background | |
| 22 | + | |
| 23 | +Lehmer met the question in 1933 while studying the factorization of certain cyclotomic functions. Smyth (1971) answered it for non-reciprocal polynomials: if $f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ is not reciprocal and $f(0) \ne 0$, then $M(f) \ge M(x^3 - x - 1) = 1.324717\ldots$, so polynomials with measure close to 1 must be reciprocal. For an algebraic number of degree $d$ that is not a root of unity, Dobrowolski proved that its Mahler measure is at least $1 + (1-\epsilon)(\log\log d / \log d)^3$ for large $d$, a bound which tends to 1 and so leaves the question open. | |
| 24 | + | |
| 25 | +## What is known | |
| 26 | + | |
| 27 | +- **Upper bound:** $L \le M(\ell) = 1.176280\ldots$ (Lehmer, 1933). Borwein, Dobrowolski and Mossinghoff (2007) note that this is still the smallest known measure larger than 1 of an integer polynomial. | |
| 28 | +- **Lower bound:** only the trivial $L \ge 1$ is known in general. | |
| 29 | +- **Partial results:** Smyth's bound for non-reciprocal polynomials (1971), Dobrowolski's degree-dependent bound, and results for restricted classes such as polynomials with odd coefficients (Borwein, Dobrowolski and Mossinghoff, 2007). | |
| 30 | + | |
| 31 | +## What would count as progress | |
| 32 | + | |
| 33 | +- An integer polynomial $f$ with $1 < M(f) < 1.176280$. Checking it takes seconds: compute its roots with certified error bounds (for example in ball arithmetic) and confirm it has no cyclotomic factor. | |
| 34 | +- A proof that $L > 1$ (Lehmer's conjecture), or an explicit lower bound for a natural infinite class of reciprocal polynomials not covered before. | |
| 35 | +- Whether Lehmer's polynomial attains the minimum is also open. Both statements are in Lean in [formal-conjectures](https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/main/FormalConjectures/Wikipedia/LehmerMahlerMeasureProblem.lean). | |
| 36 | + | |
| 37 | +## References | |
| 38 | + | |
| 39 | +1. D. H. Lehmer, "Factorization of certain cyclotomic functions", *Annals of Mathematics* 34 (1933), 461–479. [doi:10.2307/1968172](https://doi.org/10.2307/1968172) | |
| 40 | +2. C. J. Smyth, "On the product of the conjugates outside the unit circle of an algebraic integer", *Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society* 3 (1971), 169–175. [doi:10.1112/blms/3.2.169](https://doi.org/10.1112/blms/3.2.169) | |
| 41 | +3. P. Borwein, E. Dobrowolski and M. J. Mossinghoff, "Lehmer's problem for polynomials with odd coefficients", *Annals of Mathematics* 166 (2007), 347–366. [doi:10.4007/annals.2007.166.347](https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2007.166.347) | |
| 42 | + | |
| 43 | +## Source | |
| 44 | + | |
| 45 | +Imported from [Optimization Constants in Mathematics, constant 40a](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/40a.html), curated by Terence Tao and contributors. Open according to the source as of 2026-10-20. The statement above is written in our own words; see the source for the original wording, history and discussion. | |