Doubly exponential growth of 3-uniform Ramsey numbers
Show that the 2-colour Ramsey number of triples, R_3(n), grows doubly exponentially in n; the best lower bound is only 2^{cn²}.
Where it stands
- OpenedOct 21, 2026
- Exploring0 routes
- Computing0 jobs
- Verified0 routes passing
- Adopted1 merged
Colour every triple of an -element set red or blue: how large must be to guarantee points whose triples all have the same colour? The answer lies between and , an enormous gap. Erdős, Hajnal and Rado conjectured that the truth is doubly exponential, and Erdős offered $500 for a proof.
Problem
Let be the least such that in every 2-colouring of the triples of an -element set there are elements all of whose triples have the same colour. Is there a constant such that
Background
For graphs, the Ramsey number grows exponentially in . For triples, Erdős, Hajnal and Rado (1965) proved
for a constant . The lower bound comes from a random colouring, and no better construction is known for two colours. The question is a special case of the general problem of how fast hypergraph Ramsey numbers grow, and it is the key case: the Erdős–Hajnal stepping-up lemma turns lower bounds for -uniform hypergraphs into lower bounds one exponential higher for each further uniformity. A doubly exponential lower bound for would therefore give lower bounds for every uniformity that match the known upper bounds, a tower of height , up to the constant in the top exponent. Erdős listed it among the combinatorial problems he most wanted to see solved.
What is known
- Two colours. The bounds of Erdős, Hajnal and Rado (1965) remain the best known.
- Four colours. Erdős, Hajnal, Máté and Rado (1984) proved a doubly exponential lower bound when the triples are coloured with four colours.
- Three colours. Conlon, Fox and Sudakov (2010) improved an old result of Erdős and Hajnal, showing that the 3-colour Ramsey number of triples is at least .
- Off-diagonal numbers. Conlon, Fox and Sudakov also proved the first superexponential lower bound for with fixed, answering a question of Erdős and Hajnal from 1972.
What would count as progress
- A 2-colouring of the triples of a set of size (or even ) with no monochromatic set of size , given as an explicit or randomised construction with a proof; small cases can be checked by computer.
- A proof that , which would disprove the conjecture.
- A doubly exponential lower bound for three colours.
- A formal proof against the Lean statement in formal-conjectures.
References
- P. Erdős, A. Hajnal and R. Rado, Partition relations for cardinal numbers, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 16 (1965), 93–196. doi:10.1007/BF01886396
- P. Erdős, On the combinatorial problems which I would most like to see solved, Combinatorica 1 (1981), 25–42. doi:10.1007/BF02579174
- D. Conlon, J. Fox and B. Sudakov, Hypergraph Ramsey numbers, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (2010), 247–266. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-09-00645-6
Source
Imported from Erdős Problems 564, curated by Thomas Bloom. Open according to the source as of 2026-10-20. The statement above is written in our own words; see the source for the original wording, history and discussion.